Home






Audio Archives
Client Letters
OID Features Online
OID.com Exclusive
Features


Indexes:
Investors
Funds et al.
Companies &
Investments




Contact Us
Online Advertising
Online Classifieds

Employment
Opportunities


About Your
User Name
& Password






from the Outstanding Investor Digest December 18, 2000 edition


OAKMARK FUNDS'
BILL NYGREN & HENRY BERGHOEF


(continued from preceding page)


OID: Yeah. Lots of charts looked that way.
    Nygren: That's the market all of us have faced these last couple of years. The more your investment process relied on fundamental business value and the more you've believed cheapness is a good thing, the worse you've done.
    It's almost like the more respect the investor had for what could go wrong in ideas, the worse their performance has been the last couple years. Most of us who invest with a value approach tend to be worriers by nature - thinking about what can go wrong in an idea more than the perfect home run outcome that might be out there. But that kind of thought process hasn't added anything.
    Also, in the old style of investing in mutual funds that was so frequently done 20 years ago, somebody would do their research, find a fund company they trusted, put most of their equity money with that fund and maybe check it every year or two to see how it was doing.

OID: The proverbial good old days.
    Nygren: That type of investor barely exists anymore. Whether you're talking about the individual investor or the investment adviser, the focus has continued to get shorter and shorter and shorter.
    I've been running Oakmark Select Fund for four years now. And we were very fortunate to get off to a fast start. The Fund was up quite a bit its first couple of months and then 50-something percent the next year. But what amazed me was that there were people actually redeeming. I couldn't help but wonder, "What were they hoping for?"

OID: Are you suggesting 60% per year is unrealistic?
    Nygren: One of the things we do a little differently from most of the other fund companies is that we make our managers accessible via e-mail. And it never fails - if we go through a three or four-week bad period, the e-mails start coming along the lines of, "What's wrong? I bought into this because I believed in you."
    And maybe they didn't read much of what we said - because I believe that our fund family, more than most, has gone out of its way to say, "You really shouldn't invest in any fund unless your time horizon is at least 3-5 years, if not longer."

OID: That would apply to anyone investing in equities in general, wouldn't it?
    Nygren: Absolutely. But in the mutual fund industry, that's way out there. In today's world, investors with a 3-5 month time horizon think they have a long time horizon.

OID: I guess everything's relative.
    Nygren: That's right. An acquaintance of mine was all shaken up by recent declines in the stock market. And I told her, "Relax. As long as you don't own high profile technology names, stocks are not historically expensive. Just stand pat and things will be fine."
    Well, the next day, I spoke with her. The market was down 2% that day. And she said, "You lied to me."

OID: You don't think her time horizon is long enough?
    Nygren: The word "investor" - at least the definition that most of us grew up with - doesn't represent many of the people who buy and own stocks today. We're all faced with that frustrating position that at the time our universe is the most attractive, it's probably also the time the fewest number of clients want you to buy those stocks and clients are firing you left and right.

OID: Which has to be one of the greatest indications in the world that you're on the right track.
    Nygren: You bet. As I said at the Morningstar Conference, we've received more complaints from shareholders about the fact that we own Toys "R" Us than anything else we've ever owned. We've heard things like, "If you're so stupid as to buy Toys 'R' Us, we know that we're in the wrong fund."
    But that just makes me more confident about an idea. The criticism's left me feeling very positive about it.


Page 2 of 12

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12

(return to Table of Contents)

(continue to the next page)



©Copyright 1996-2010 Outstanding Investor Digest, Inc. All rights reserved.
295 Greenwich St., Box 282, New York, NY 10007 (212) 925-3885