Outstanding Investor Digest



Home




Subscriber Areas


Audio Archives
Client Letters
OID Features Online
OID.com Exclusive
Features


Indexes:
Investors
Funds et al.
Companies &
Investments




Contact Us

About Your
User Name
& Password



Guest Areas


Free Reprint

Online Excerpts

Investors in
Our Latest Edition


Companies &
Investments in
Our Latest Edition




About OID
Subscribe
Online Advertising
Online Classifieds

Employment
Opportunities




Portfolio Reports
Home Page



from Outstanding Investor Digest's December 31, 1996 edition



MUTUAL SERIES FUNDS'
MICHAEL PRICE ET AL.
(continued from preceding page)


that all these guys are going to be dominant in one market and then just go into another market where they're not particularly well positioned and drive pricing down is pretty farfetched.


IT'S BEEN MIGHTY NASTY OUT THERE PRICE-WISE,
BUT 7-1/4 TIMES CASH EARNINGS WORKS FOR ME.

OID: If it does turn into a mistake, what do you think the epitaph is likely to read?
   Garea: The pricing environment would have to continue in 1997 like it was in 1996.

OID: So a continuation of today's pricing environment would turn it into a mistake?!
   Garea: Where people would basically significantly undercut each other on pricing relative to actual costs and where medical costs continue to rise as they have in 1996 - and, therefore, you have another year of declining margins.

OID: So competition could turn it into a mistake?
   Garea: It's kind of funny, but I have to tell you that some of the worst damage is self-inflicted.

OID: There's no need to get personal.
   Garea: Yeah. Some of it is certainly competition. But a big part of it has been self-inflicted. These guys just kind of missed the boat.

OID: They thought they could hold down costs more than they did?
   Garea: They made incorrect assumptions about medical cost trends. They basically all assumed that 1996 was going to be a continuation of the trend in 1995 - which was a decline in medical costs. And medical costs didn't go down in 1996. They turned around and went up.
   And when medical costs started to rise and HMOs had priced their product assuming a decline, that obviously wreaked havoc on their bottom line.

OID: Gotcha.
   Garea: Clearly competition plays some role in that. But I think that it was, to a pretty significant extent, a case of people just mismanaging the business. In contrast, today, people are talking about price increases on average at HMOs of 5-6%. And medical costs are going up, but not anywhere near that much.

OID: I understand that Oxford...
   Garea: I know what Oxford does. And I have looked at it. But it's not our kind of stock.

OID: Because it's selling for a high P/E?
   Garea: "High" isn't the word.

OID: It's been accused of being well run.
   Garea: I don't doubt that it's a well run company, but it trades at 50 times earnings.

Page 23 of 28

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28

(Return to Table of Contents)

(continue to the next page)



©Copyright 1996-2008 Outstanding Investor Digest, Inc. All rights reserved.
295 Greenwich St., Box 282, New York, NY 10007 (212) 925-3885