Outstanding Investor Digest



Home




Subscriber Areas


Audio Archives
Client Letters
OID Features Online
OID.com Exclusive
Features


Indexes:
Investors
Funds et al.
Companies &
Investments




Contact Us

About Your
User Name
& Password



Guest Areas


Free Reprint

Online Excerpts

Investors in
Our Latest Edition


Companies &
Investments in
Our Latest Edition




About OID
Subscribe
Online Advertising
Online Classifieds

Employment
Opportunities




Portfolio Reports
Home Page



from Outstanding Investor Digest's December 31, 1996 edition



MUTUAL SERIES FUNDS'
MICHAEL PRICE ET AL.
(continued from preceding page)


   Garea: What Foundation has done very successfully - and this is what most people couldn't comprehend or accept that it could happen - is to apply the concepts and techniques of managed care (which has been more of an acute care phenomenon) to the workers' comp business. So they've had a dramatic effect on the health care costs of workers' compensation - the claims costs, etc. And that's allowed them to maintain profit margins during a period when the workers' comp business was under pressure. And now when that premium pressure has sort of abated, they've also been able to grow that business dramatically because they have a much better cost structure.

OID: How much overlap is there geographically?
   Garea: The biggest overlap is in California. They're both California HMOs. Plus there's some overlap in Colorado and the Northwest. Also, Foundation has some CHAMPUS contracts - which are a government contract.

OID: And that stands for Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniform Service.
   Garea: That's right. That's the government healthcare program for the military. And Foundation's CHAMPUS program is already in Arizona, Texas and places like that. So that foothold will help Health Systems be more effective in their development of their HMO outside of that program in those places. So I think that's a plus.
   Other than that, there's the usual corporate overlap. You don't need two of everything. So margins will go up. And their SG&A as a percentage of sales should go down.


THERE WILL BE COMPETITION AMONG HMOS -
BUT PROBABLY RATIONAL AND MARKET-SPECIFIC.

OID: Health Systems' fundamentals - even before adding back goodwill amortization - are striking. The adjusted price-to-sales ratio, for example, is tiny - especially given that it's historically managed a 30%+ ROE.
   Garea: Absolutely.

OID: On the other hand, the price-to-book here prior to the acquisition must be up around 3-1/2 times.
   Garea: Book value in the case of HMOs is not a

Page 21 of 28

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28

(Return to Table of Contents)

(continue to the next page)



©Copyright 1996-2008 Outstanding Investor Digest, Inc. All rights reserved.
295 Greenwich St., Box 282, New York, NY 10007 (212) 925-3885