
Home


Audio Archives
Client Letters
OID Features Online
OID.com Exclusive Features
Indexes:
Investors
Funds et al.
Companies & Investments

Contact Us
About Your
User Name & Password

Free Reprint
Online Excerpts
Investors in
Our Latest Edition
Companies & Investments in
Our Latest Edition

About OID
Subscribe
Online Advertising
Online Classifieds
Employment Opportunities

|
from Outstanding Investor Digest's December 31, 1996 edition
MUTUAL SERIES FUNDS'
MICHAEL PRICE ET AL.
(continued from preceding
page)
  One of the things the board does when they look at
the contract, the actual expense ratio and the advisory fee
is to compare it to what else is out there. And it's always
been in the middle or below the fund industry [average].
The two foreign funds - where our expenses are
much higher - are at 80 basis points. And Mutual Shares
at 60 [basis points] is below the industry average. You
can't get the kind of investing that we do, I don't think,
anywhere else in the [mutual fund] industry - the mix of
bankruptcies, deals and cheap stocks - in any other
mutual fund group. If you [do] want to duplicate it, you
have to buy partnerships. And their fees are 1% plus 20%
of the profits in many cases.
So I've thought that Mutual's been
a bargain for years....
We get terrific, cheap execution. It's our money, too.
Price: On the trading side, we do a lot of business.
We do it with everyone on Wall Street. Typically, we do it
at 4-5¢ per share. And we get terrific executions. On the
telephones on our trading desk, each turret has 15 pages
of 40 lines [each]. That's 600 different lines. We're using
300-400 of 'em now - to domestic and foreign brokers. We
have nine floor brokers on the New York Stock Exchange,
three on the American, wires to Over-the-Counter firms -
wires everywhere. And we trade as cheaply as we can.
Once again, remember it's our money, too....
BIG ISN'T NECESSARILY BAD.
E.G., SEARS, ITT AND CHASE.
Big isn't necessarily bad - for example, Sears....
Shareholder: Some worry that if
Mutual Series funds
get a lot more money, they'll have to go to larger cap stocks
and, therefore, be a lot less nimble. Do you feel very
confident that the Mutual Series funds
will do as well in the future as they have in the past?
Price: Some of our best situations have been the
largest cap stocks. A perfect comparison is Sears Roebuck
- which Rob Friedman got us
involved in - versus Wal-Mart
five years ago. Wal-Mart stock was $25 - and Sears was
$33. In the past five years, Sears went from $33 to today's
price in the high $40s. But, meanwhile, it's given us stock
in Allstate and stock in
Dean Witter and cash distributions.
So adjusting for all of those distributions, Sears's stock is
probably $120 - and Wal-Mart is still $25.
That's the difference between a growth stock that
doesn't grow or whose growth slows and a value stock
where the value's unlocked. And Sears had 350 million
shares outstanding. So it was a huge market cap.
  [Editor's note: Actually, we estimate that Wal-Mart
had a larger market cap than Sears, but
who's counting....]
We've owned ITT (profitably) several times in years past.
Price: And we find other ... [big cap investments].
For years, Larry Sondike has
worked on ITT. And we've
probably owned it three or four times in the last 12 years.
We've made money every time. As you know, ITT split into
three parts. We traded out of all three parts.
Now we're starting to buy back the three parts - two
Page 6 of 28
Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28

©Copyright
1996-2010 Outstanding Investor Digest, Inc. All rights reserved.
295 Greenwich St., Box 282, New York, NY 10007 (212) 925-3885
|