Outstanding Investor Digest



Home




Subscriber Areas


Audio Archives
Client Letters
OID Features Online
OID.com Exclusive
Features


Indexes:
Investors
Funds et al.
Companies &
Investments




Contact Us

About Your
User Name
& Password



Guest Areas


Free Reprint

Online Excerpts

Investors in
Our Latest Edition


Companies &
Investments in
Our Latest Edition




About OID
Subscribe
Online Advertising
Online Classifieds

Employment
Opportunities




Portfolio Reports
Home Page



from Outstanding Investor Digest's December 31, 1999 edition



LONGLEAF PARTNERS FUNDS'
MASON HAWKINS, C.T. FITZPATRICK & STALEY CATES

(continued from preceding page)

    Hawkins: A couple of years ago, we went from the SEC to the IRS as our regulator of diversification. You have those two choices in our business as managers of mutual funds.
    And by going to the IRS standard for diversification, technically we can have half our portfolio in 10 companies with no more than 5% in each of those. And then with respect to the other 50% of the assets, we could have as few as two holdings. So in effect, we could own as few as 12 companies - ten 5% stakes and two 25% stakes - without violating IRS standards for diversification.
    I doubt that we'll ever get into a situation where we ever have enough confidence to have 25% of our portfolio committed to one company. However, it's possible under IRS guidelines....





We did add aggressively to UCAR. But we were limited.
    Shareholder: Obviously, you folks - and I think we as advisors - have a lot of conviction in your process. But when one company takes up 15% of your assets, haven't you introduced a lot of unsystematic risk into the equation that Graham might take issue with as far as the margin of safety and the value of diversification?
    Secondly, one of the other holdings that you've had in your portfolio for about two years is UCAR International. That's a stock, I believe, that you purchased in the mid-$30s that's had all kinds of management changes, [allegations of] price fixing and lawsuits. And yet that's a company that's fluctuated widely in value. How do you compare a situation like that, where the price has fluctuated down to as low as $12-13, [to Waste Management]? Why not have doubled up on that and done the same thing if you have the same conviction in the fortunes of that company?

    Hawkins: First of all, the values have not fluctuated

PORTFOLIO REPORTS estimates the following were Longleaf Partners Fund's largest equity purchases during the quarter ended 9/30/99:


1. WASTE MGMT INC
2. GENERAL MOTORS CORP
3. GEORGIA-PACIFIC TIMBER GRP
4. TRICON GLOBAL RESTAURANTS
5. HILTON HOTELS CORP
6. TRIZECHAHN CORP
7. NIPPON FIRE & MARINE INS CO LTD
8. FDX CORP
9. YASUDA FIRE & MARINE INS CO LTD


that dramatically, but the prices have…. And … we did add aggressively. There's a maximum stake we can have in UCAR.

    Cates: They have a poison pill that we're right under.


Page 8 of 12

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12

(Return to Table of Contents)

(continue to the next page)



©Copyright 1996-2008 Outstanding Investor Digest, Inc. All rights reserved.
295 Greenwich St., Box 282, New York, NY 10007 (212) 925-3885