Outstanding Investor Digest



Home




Subscriber Areas


Audio Archives
Client Letters
OID Features Online
OID.com Exclusive
Features


Indexes:
Investors
Funds et al.
Companies &
Investments




Contact Us

About Your
User Name
& Password



Guest Areas


Free Reprint

Online Excerpts

Investors in
Our Latest Edition


Companies &
Investments in
Our Latest Edition




About OID
Subscribe
Online Advertising
Online Classifieds

Employment
Opportunities




Portfolio Reports
Home Page



from Outstanding Investor Digest's December 31, 1999 edition



LONGLEAF PARTNERS FUNDS'
MASON HAWKINS, C.T. FITZPATRICK & STALEY CATES

(continued from preceding page)


WE DON'T VIEW WASTE MANAGEMENT AS A MISTAKE.
AND LONG-TERM, WE THINK IT'S AN OPPORTUNITY.


Waste Management was once a very successful position.
    Shareholder: Nobody's perfect. And we all want to learn from our mistakes - all of us. Is there anything that you've learned about your own internal processes - your buy discipline, your sell discipline, etc. - that you'd modify after this entire Waste Management experience?

    Hawkins: I'd like to do a review of our experience at Waste Management with you, if I could.

    Shareholder: Sure.

    Hawkins: You remember they had major accounting issues before when Waste Management was on its own - and its stock melted down from $40 to the low $20s. Well, we took a major stake at that point. And that investment was very successful.
    The company then merged with USA Waste to solve a management issue. Waste Management's board brought in USA Waste in order to get John Drury and Rod Proto. It was unanimously viewed by Wall Street as a good solution…. It went up into the high $50s.
    Looking in the rear view mirror, Waste Management was a very successful investment at that juncture. And we had about 5% of our assets committed to it at the end of the second quarter when the company's stock was trading at $54 per share. At that point, it got to our appraisal. And we were in the throes of cutting our position back.

Task of putting the companies together was too much….
    Hawkins: But [then] CEO John Drury had to admit through his doctors that he could not come back to the company because of his brain cancer. All of the management responsibilities then went to Rod Proto. And in our view, those management responsibilities were too significant for this one person to handle in terms of putting two companies together, two accounting systems together and two cultures together - what have you. They've been very challenged by the issues of USA Waste being combined with the old Waste Management.
    A number of other issues have come up subsequently. And clearly, some of them are substantive….

We don't feel like Waste Management is a mistake.
    Hawkins: However, the case that remains is that here's a company with the best landfills in the country, in an industry where the competition has really shrunk to two major companies. Browning Ferris and Allied have combined into a single company [Allied Waste]. And USA Waste and Waste Management have combined into the other [Waste Management].
    Meanwhile, waste streams are growing. The supply of landfills is limited. And we believe as a long-term investor, a year from now we will look back and say that we have the best assets, great management, good systems and a very good earnings stream that will be highly rewarded in the equity market. So we don't feel like it's a mistake.


Page 5 of 12

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12

(Return to Table of Contents)

(continue to the next page)



©Copyright 1996-2008 Outstanding Investor Digest, Inc. All rights reserved.
295 Greenwich St., Box 282, New York, NY 10007 (212) 925-3885