from Outstanding Investor Digest's December 31, 1999 edition
LONGLEAF PARTNERS FUNDS'
MASON HAWKINS, C.T. FITZPATRICK & STALEY CATES
(continued from preceding
page)
WE DON'T VIEW WASTE MANAGEMENT AS A MISTAKE.
AND LONG-TERM, WE THINK IT'S AN OPPORTUNITY.
Waste Management was once a very successful position.
Shareholder: Nobody's perfect. And we all want to learn from our
mistakes - all of us. Is there anything that you've learned about your own internal processes -
your buy discipline, your sell discipline, etc. - that you'd modify after this entire Waste
Management experience?
Hawkins: I'd like to do a review of our experience at Waste
Management with you, if I could.
Shareholder: Sure.
Hawkins: You remember they had major accounting issues before when
Waste Management was on its own - and its stock melted down from $40 to the low $20s. Well, we took
a major stake at that point. And that investment was very successful.
The company then merged with USA Waste to solve a management issue. Waste
Management's board brought in USA Waste in order to get John Drury and Rod Proto. It was
unanimously viewed by Wall Street as a good solution
. It went up into the high $50s.
Looking in the rear view mirror, Waste Management was a very successful
investment at that juncture. And we had about 5% of our assets committed to it at the end of the
second quarter when the company's stock was trading at $54 per share. At that point, it got to our
appraisal. And we were in the throes of cutting our position back.
Task of putting the companies together was too much
.
Hawkins: But [then] CEO John Drury had to admit through his doctors
that he could not come back to the company because of his brain cancer. All of the management
responsibilities then went to Rod Proto. And in our view, those management responsibilities were
too significant for this one person to handle in terms of putting two companies together, two
accounting systems together and two cultures together - what have you. They've been very challenged
by the issues of USA Waste being combined with the old Waste Management.
A number of other issues have come up subsequently. And clearly, some of
them are substantive
.
We don't feel like Waste Management is a mistake.
Hawkins: However, the case that remains is that here's a company
with the best landfills in the country, in an industry where the competition has really shrunk to
two major companies. Browning Ferris and Allied have combined into a single company [Allied Waste].
And USA Waste and Waste Management have combined into the other [Waste Management].
Meanwhile, waste streams are growing. The supply of landfills is limited.
And we believe as a long-term investor, a year from now we will look back and say that we have the
best assets, great management, good systems and a very good earnings stream that will be highly
rewarded in the equity market. So we don't feel like it's a mistake.
Page 5 of 12
©Copyright
1996-2008 Outstanding Investor Digest, Inc. All rights reserved.
295 Greenwich St., Box 282, New York, NY 10007 (212) 925-3885
|