
Home


Audio Archives
Client Letters
OID Features Online
OID.com Exclusive Features
Indexes:
Investors
Funds et al.
Companies & Investments

Contact Us
About Your
User Name & Password

Free Reprint
Online Excerpts
Investors in
Our Latest Edition
Companies & Investments in
Our Latest Edition

About OID
Subscribe
Online Advertising
Online Classifieds
Employment Opportunities

|
from Outstanding Investor Digest's August 8, 1996 edition
CUNDILL VALUE & CUNDILL SECURITY FUND'S
PETER CUNDILL & TIM MCELVAINE
(continued from preceding
page)
A SMART ACQUISITION, SHARE REPURCHASES
AND TIMELY, FAVORABLE ASSET SALES....
Cundill: I have a long history with Paribas indirectly -- going all the way back to my early days. It was founded in
1872...
OID: You really do have a long history with it.
Cundill:
Early in my career, I actually worked for a Canadian bank affiliated with
it. Paribas was founded as a banque d'affaires -- as a sort of businessman's
bank. And they created a lot of companies, invested some of the bank's funds
and acted primarily as dealmaker -- in effect, as one of the early investment
bankers -- before they developed into a wholesale bank.
But, in 1981, they were nationalized by the Socialists. Then, they
were privatized and relaunched -- if you will -- with a number of strategic
shareholders in 1986.
Today, Paribas basically consists of four parts: First, they have
the investment bank -- Paribas. Second, they own 46% of a specialized
financial institution bank called the Compagnie Bancaire -- which is also
publicly traded. Third, they own 100% of a retail bank -- Credit du Nord
-- which isn't terribly profitable. And fourth, they have a portfolio that
was worth about $8 billion at year end 1995.
OID: Based on stock market prices at that time.
Cundill:
That's right. And at the end of last year, Paribas took a huge amount of
losses. As a result, the bank's estimate of NAV declined all the way from
FF493 down to FF438. And its shares got down near FF250 -- from FF520 or
so in the prior 12-18 months. So they've really come down.
OID: So far, so good. But what about today?
Cundill: Since year end, Paribas'
shares have worked their way up to about FF300. And, in the interim, I believe
they've paid a net dividend of FF14.
But, meanwhile,
they also did a deal with a company called Navigation Mixte -- which they
owned 33% of already. They bought the remaining 67% at a price that made
me quite delighted to be a Paribas shareholder. But I don't think I'd have
been so pleased about it had I been a Navigation Mixte shareholder. But
it got done.
McElvaine: And
in typical French fashion -- similar to the Japanese practice of interlocking
shareholders --Navigation Mixte was both one of its largest shareholdings
and Paribas' largest shareholder. Navigation Mixte's ownership of Paribas
shares represented about 12% of Paribas' votes and 8-1/2% of its equity.
So that transaction
represented a large repurchase of their own shares at a price we think was
even below the low its stock reached last year -- at least it was when you
net out proceeds of other Navigation Mixte assets that they've since sold.
However, they haven't canceled those shares yet. So
for the time being, they're holding it as treasury stock. But we calculate
that they effectively repurchased those shares at FF250. So they substantially
reduced their capitalization at a significant discount to NAV.
OID: In essence, it was a very positive development
and enhanced the value of the remaining shares.
McElvaine:
Exactly. Then, the other major thing that happened in the first half of
this year is that they disposed of a number of holdings -- the largest of
which was a company called Poliet. They'll receive the proceeds from that
sale over several years, although they'll receive most of it in '97-'98.
And that sale should generate some FF3 billion. Plus, they also had several
other disposals at prices well in excess of their carrying value.
So I think their restated NAV -- and I say I think because they haven't released their
June 30th numbers -- is FF475-500. And we're comfortable with that estimate.
OID: And that's stated book, not the net asset value
or adjusted book which you referenced earlier.
McElvaine:
That's right.
OID: And the reason why stated book is lower is that
you've written up certain assets to market in your estimate of NAV.
McElvaine:
That's right. But, again, what accounted for the enormous increase in NAV
was the combination of the share repurchases and asset sales I mentioned
earlier.
Page 12 of 27
Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13
14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27

©Copyright
1996-2010 Outstanding Investor Digest, Inc. All rights reserved.
295 Greenwich St., Box 282, New York, NY 10007 (212) 925-3885
|