
Home


Audio Archives
Client Letters
OID Features Online
OID.com Exclusive Features
Indexes:
Investors
Funds et al.
Companies & Investments

Contact Us
About Your
User Name & Password

Free Reprint
Online Excerpts
Investors in
Our Latest Edition
Companies & Investments in
Our Latest Edition

About OID
Subscribe
Online Advertising
Online Classifieds
Employment Opportunities

Portfolio Reports
Home Page
|
from Outstanding Investor Digest's August 8, 1996 edition
CUNDILL VALUE & CUNDILL SECURITY FUND'S
PETER CUNDILL & TIM MCELVAINE
(continued from preceding
page)
I HAVEN'T DECIDED TO CHANGE PROFESSIONS,
BUT WE DO PAY MORE ATTENTION TO THE BUSINESS.
We still look to the balance sheet for our margin of
safety.
Shareholder: Buffett's partner, Charlie Munger,
has been somewhat unkind to money managers...
Cundill: Yeah, but he didn't persuade me to become a
plumber.
Shareholder: But he's apparently pulled Buffett away from a pure
Benjamin Graham-approach to value investing. And I know that you're a value
investor -- along with Charles Brandes and John Templeton. Are you a pure
Benjamin Graham afficionado or are you leaning towards growth investing
as well?
Cundill: I think we're still looking for margin of safety in the
balance sheet as distinct from the business.
But we're paying increasing attention to the business.
Cundill: But it's been really interesting to
watch. We had a one-day seminar ... about six weeks ago in which Tony Browne
-- one of the principals of Roxbury who's become a Warren Buffett growth
fella -- talked about his transformation as he went along.
And we've had a bit of a transformation, too. In the '90-'91 period,
you could buy a $1 bill for 50¢, but the business deteriorated. So
the $1 bill can also shrink in value. And therefore, we're paying a lot
more attention to the business.
The real barnburner, of course, is if you can buy the $1 bill for
50¢ and it turns around. Then you get all sorts of benefits. And that's
happened to us over the years.
I was thinking about this very theme as I was running this morning.
I think what Charlie Munger said to Buffett -- although Buffett was coming
independently to this view -- was that if you can buy the business at a
multiple well below the rate of growth -- and I'm thinking of Coca-Cola
-- the margin of safety is in the business itself.
That's something we haven't done. But I think we're always studying
to try and get it better.
In bad markets, babies get thrown out with
the bath water.
Cundill: In a bad market, like the one that
happened in the mid-1970's, you got wonderful businesses. You got franchises
that were trading below cash that were growing and earning high returns
on shareholders' equity.
As you may recall, that was when Buffett really made his bones because
he built his liabilities from 1969 to 1974. So he had the cash to be able
to make purchases. In bad markets, everything converges [price-wise].
So, yes -- we look to the balance sheet first. But we're worrying
about the nature of the business more....
Page 7 of 27
Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13
14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27

©Copyright
1996-2008 Outstanding Investor Digest, Inc. All rights reserved.
295 Greenwich St., Box 282, New York, NY 10007 (212) 925-3885
|