Outstanding Investor Digest



Home




Subscriber Areas


Audio Archives
Client Letters
OID Features Online
OID.com Exclusive
Features


Indexes:
Investors
Funds et al.
Companies &
Investments




Contact Us

About Your
User Name
& Password



Guest Areas


Free Reprint

Online Excerpts

Investors in
Our Latest Edition


Companies &
Investments in
Our Latest Edition




About OID
Subscribe
Online Advertising
Online Classifieds

Employment
Opportunities



OID.com EDITORIAL


from Outstanding Investor Digest's December 31, 1996 Edition

CENTURY MANAGEMENT'S
ARNOLD VAN DEN BERG

(continued from preceding page)


MANAGEMENT ISN'T 100% SHAREHOLDER-ORIENTED,
BUT THEY ARE ENGINEERS THROUGH AND THROUGH.

OID: What can you tell us about their management?
Van Den Berg: They're honest, hard working and competent. But they're not the focused kind of management that's totally shareholder-oriented. If they were, they could probably realize the $45-50 value that I've mentioned.
They're extremely conservative though. For example, when we ask them about the real estate - why they don't sell it and redeploy the capital into the business - they say, "Well. Yeah. It's good real estate. But why sell it and have to pay taxes? And the excess pension? Yeah. That's true. But we used the pension when we needed money to fund our R&D and our sales growth."
So they're not really driven to move their stock.

OID: What are they driven by?
Van Den Berg: This management is engineers through and through. And what they're driven by are engineering-related considerations - in other words, by their desire to do research and produce quality products.

OID: Still, how much of Moore's subpar margins have been a result of subpar management or other factors?
Van Den Berg: As I mentioned, they just completed a tremendous surge in their spending on R&D.
Sales, on the other hand, didn't go up that much during those years. So part of their subpar returns have been a result of heavier expenditures on R&D - which we believe, and which they believe, will be trending down once their new line is funded.
But if you look at their margins, you can also see a deterioration in their pretax margin outside of the difference in R&D spending. And that's just because SG&A expenses increased relative to sales.
So part of the lower margins and returns may be due to management not being quite as cost conscious as they might be. In other words, if a shareholder-oriented fanatic were running Moore, he'd probably be able to fine tune their operation and make it achieve the kind of margins that it's earned historically.

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13
(return to Table of Contents)   (continue to the next page)

©Copyright 1996-2010 Outstanding Investor Digest, Inc. All rights reserved.
295 Greenwich St., Box 282, New York, NY 10007 (212) 925-3885